Pre-Columbian fossil collectors unearthed
|Excavation pit houses at the Harris Archaeological Site in southwestern New Mexico [Credit: Falvey and McLaurin]|
One day, while digging out one of the village’s homes, Falvey, who also has a keen interest in palaeontology, noticed fossils in the rubble that didn’t match the stones or other material used to make the adobe walls. Besides appearing in limestone hand tools found at the site, 25 individual fossils — including a wide variety of marine creatures, such as corals, and shelled creatures, such as brachiopods — have been recovered from 14 of the 19 homes excavated thus far. The fossils, which came from limestone dating to between 318 million and 385 million years ago, stood out because they didn’t come from the rocks immediately surrounding the village, says Falvey.
Several of the fossils were found within the collapsed adobe walls of a pit house, and others were found at the bottom of post holes — locations where they must have been intentionally placed during the home’s construction, somewhat like the lucky coins embedded in the foundations of new homes today.
Although outcrops of limestone that once entombed the fossils are located within 4 kilometres of the Harris Archaeological Site, several clues hint that the fossils actually came from Cookes Peak, a mountain 43 kilometres away that was apparently revered by the people of the village. For one thing, says Falvey, all of the ramps leading out of the pit houses point towards the mountain, an orientation that ensures that residents departing their homes get a clear view of the distant peak. Also, she notes, rock carvings found on Cookes Peak suggest that the Mimbres people conducted rituals or ceremonies there. Detailed geochemical analyses of the fossils could help to determine where the fossils were originally collected, she notes.
Finding fossils at archaeological sites in the American Southwest is unusual, says Falvey. Nevertheless, she notes, researchers excavating other sites — especially those without a background or interest in palaeontology — may not have not reported any such finds simply because they didn’t recognize the anomalous provenance, and therefore the ritual significance, of any fossils they had unearthed.
Author:Sid Perkins | Source: Nature Newsblog [November 09, 2012]